Let me take a look at the Professor’s work from another angle, i

Let me take a look at the Professor’s work from another angle, i.e., from the viewpoint of child neurology and the JSCN. He started his career at the Department of Pediatrics, University of Tokyo in April 1960, and was soon active, along with myself, as a part of the child neurology team. However, our time together was limited, as four years later, he completed a graduate course and then moved to Unites

States in July 1964. During this 4 years period, he gained buy Ribociclib his PhD with a thesis on a neuropathologic study of an autopsied MLD case [4]. This case became the first example of MLD in Japan. The most impressive article for me in early days is a report on neuropathology of a FCMD case published in 1976 [5]. This is the first orthodox, English-written paper on FCMD in the world. FCMD is a new entity discovered by myself in 1960, and numerous supportive investigations had been published inside Japan already; however, nearly all papers were written only in Japanese, so that

the disease entity of FCMD had been seldom recognized outside Japan. Kamoshita’s paper opened a window to the world for the first time. During the period in United States (1964–1968) he engaged in the study of developmental neuropathology at the Department of Pathology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles and the University of Southern California School of Medicine (chief: Dr. Benjamin H Landing) for 3 years, and at the Departments of Neurology and Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine (chief: Dr. Kinuko Suzuki selleck and Dr. Kunihiko Suzuki). He contributed multiple original reports on neuropathology of several neurometabolic-degenerative disorders such as infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy with neonatal onset [6], infantile Niemann–Pick disease [7], lipidoses, ataxia telangiectasia, etc. His articles Phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase are characterized by keen observations and precise descriptions, but always they included some novel viewpoints and hypotheses. On the other hand, as you see from Table 3, his relationship with the JSCN was both long and deep, through 43 years of membership. In particular, he served as

the president of the 25th Annual Meeting of JSCN in 1983, and, for another six years (1993–1999) he executed heavy responsibilities of the chief director with distinction. His resolute posture as he provided concise and appropriate comments from the moderator’s seat at the meetings each year remains vivid in our brain. He was a productive and proficient author, and published innumerable original articles and reviews in the field of child neurology, in addition to some in general pediatrics. He was an educator and mentor at a top ranked position, and, as a consequence, numerous excellent pupils grew up under his guidance to become leaders of the next generation in various field of pediatrics throughout Japan [8].

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>