Furthermore confirming this observation, direct group comparisons showed that STG/S was significantly more active in response to the presence of co-speech beat selleck screening library gesture in TD children than in children with ASD. Rather, the direct group comparisons revealed that children with ASD showed significantly greater activity than TD children within visual areas when processing co-speech beat gesture. Interestingly,

activity in these visual areas was found to positively correlate with symptom severity as indexed by both the ADOS-G and SRS. Between-group comparisons of STG/S activity in response to viewing co-speech beat gesture – observed both in neurotypical adults and in TD children – may represent the integration of multimodal Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical speech cues. Thus, for children with ASD, the observation that co-speech beat gesture has a modulatory effect on visual cortices (and that this effect becomes greater as a function of symptom severity) instead of on STG/S suggests

that the auditory and visual aspects of the stimuli are being processed Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical somewhat independently. Taken together, these findings suggest that children with ASD are not effectively integrating information from multiple sensory Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical modalities during social communication. Although there are similarities between the responses we observed in this sample of TD children and those we previously observed in normal adults (Hubbard et al. 2009) for viewing co-speech beat gesture, there were also a number of differences. Neurotypical adults demonstrate greater activity in right anterior STG for the contrast of beat gesture Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical with speech versus nonsense hand movement with speech (Hubbard et al. 2009); in TD children, however, significant differences for this contrast

were observed only at liberal thresholds. Additionally, unlike neurotypical adults, TD children did not show increases in motor cortex in response to viewing co-speech beat gesture, and STG/S responses to co-speech beat gesture were limited to the right hemisphere (whereas responses were bilateral in normal adults). This decreased sensitivity in TD children may perhaps reflect Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical developmental differences in multimodal speech perception. For example, in a seminal study on audiovisual speech perception (McGurk and MacDonald 1976), only 52% of TD children ages 7–8 years old were shown to be impacted by the presence (-)-p-Bromotetramisole Oxalate of contradictory audiovisual speech cues. Future studies directly comparing children and adults are needed to further characterize developmental changes in the neural basis of multimodal speech perception. In the case of children with ASD, increases in neural activity over that observed in TD controls is often interpreted as reflecting a compensatory strategy. For example, in Wang et al. (2006), increased activity for children with ASD (within regions recruited by TD controls) was suggested to reflect more effortful processing needed to complete the language processing task.