ys to quantify the sensitivities. We found that deletion of 52 genes caused viability to decrease by 25 fold or more upon treatment of at least one reagent, suggesting those genes play important roles in DDR. Among these 52 genes, 24 genes were identified in previous large scale screens, and 32 genes in Navitoclax 923564-51-6 total have been reported to be related with DDR, which validates the accuracy of our screen. For example, genes Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries directly involved in sensing and repairing DNA dam age were identified. Proteins encoded by these genes include, Rad1 and Rad9, two subunits of a checkpoint complex, Crb2, Rep2 and Ulp2, proteins required for cell cycle control, Rhp55, Sen1 and Srs2, proteins involved in DNA double strand break and single strand break repair. As expected, deletions of these genes were sensitive to a Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries broad range of DNA damage reagents.
Genes involved in Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries spindle assembly and cytokinesis were also obtained, including dad5, atb2, mad1, pab1, myo1 and scd1. As expected, deletions of these genes exhibited sensitivity to TBZ, a microtubule depolymerizing agent. Chromatin controls the accessibility of the DNA repair machinery, and thus it was not surprised to identify genes related to the dynamics of chromatin structure. Such proteins included Set1 and Ash2, subunits of a histone H3K4 methyltransferase com plex, Clr4 and Swi6, subunits of an H3K9 methyl transferase, Gcn5, Sgf73 and Spt20, subunits of the SAGA histone acetylase complex, Pst2, a component of Clr6 deacetylase complex, Snf5, a subunit of the Swi Snf remodeling complex, Pht1, a histone H2A variant.
These results stress the importance of histone Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries modification GSK-3 and chromatin remodeling in DDR. SPBC409. 15, sec65, tcg1, cch1 and SPAC19A8. 11c were identified previously during other genome wide screens. Identification by our screen confirmed the rele vance of these genes to DDR. However, several known DDR genes identified in the previous large scale screens, including ctp1, rhp51, rad32, rad26, pnk1, rad3, hus1, rad17, rad24, rhp57, were not screened out in this study. This might be caused by different screen strategy, different choice of DNA damaging agents and their working concentrations. Besides, the commercial library we used contained errors. We checked the mutants of several known DDR genes and found rhp51, rad26, rad3 were wrong. Therefore, the quality of the library also affected the results of our screen.
On the other hand, another 20 genes were found to be linked with DDR for the first time in this study, and the identities of corresponding mutants have been double checked. Among 20 genes, 10 genes have been already identified to function in different biological processes, including biosynthesis, RNA processing, stress response, transport and chromatin read this modification. Notably, deletion of trk1, a gene encoding the potassium ion transporter, caused strong sensitivity to almost all the DNA damage reagents used in our assay. There was no assigned function for the remaining 10 genes, they were classif