We found that

concrete nouns and verbs activate frontocentral cortex to different degrees. Whereas motor and premotor areas are relatively more strongly activated by action verbs, concrete nouns activated more anterior prefrontal areas. At the cognitive level, these differential activations appear to relate to the processing of action schemas that are part of the semantic representation of action verbs and of form knowledge semantically linked to object words. Abstract nouns and verbs fail to elicit similar activation differences, thus calling this website into question previous claims about genuine brain loci for the major lexical categories. Systematic investigation of other areas, especially temporal cortex, Sotrastaurin manufacturer also failed to reveal a genuine distinction between noun and verb processing loci. We

suggest that topographical brain activation differences elicited by words are driven by semantic factors and that the lexical category distinction is mechanistically implemented at a level beyond the grain size of neurometabolic imaging. This work was supported by the MRC (MC_US_A060_0034, U1055.04.003.00001.01 to F.P., MRC studentship to R.M.), EPSRC and BBSRC (BABEL grant), DFG (Center of Excellence “Languages of Emotion”) and Freie Universität Berlin. We would like to thank Clare Cook, Olaf Hauk, Bettina Mohr, Yury Shtyrov and Francesca Carota for their help at different stages of this work. “
“In Chen Y-K, Wong KS, Mok V, Ungvari GS, Tang WK. Health-related quality of life in patients with poststroke emotional incontinence. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:1659-62 author affiliations should read: From the Departments of Psychiatry (Tang) and Medicine and Therapeutics (Wong, Mok), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Department of Neurology, Dongguan People’s Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong Province, P.R. China (Chen); and the School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Notre Dame, Australia, Marian Centre, Perth, Australia (Ungvari). “
“The article, Graham JE, Karmarkar

AM, Ottenbacher KJ. BCKDHA Small sample research designs for evidence-based rehabilitation: issues and methods. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93:S111-6, was mistakenly published online as an uncorrected proof in May 2012. The article was embargoed to publish as a special communication with all other content for the August 2012 Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation supplemental issue (August 2012; Vol 93, No. 8, Suppl 2). In an attempt to remove the article from online publication and remedy the publishing error, the publisher erroneously retracted the article. The authors in no way precipitated the unintended retraction and at no time was the article retracted because of an ethical violation or issue. The publisher apologizes for this error. “
“On May 19 and 20, 2012, the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation held the Part II (oral) certification examination.