The selected list of publications was also analyzed according to the distribution of the assay information and checked for different formats in which these data are represented in the Lapatinib cost publications. In more than 90% of the papers the assay conditions are described in free text, mainly within the Material and Methods section. But about 50% of the publications also represent assay conditions in the legends of tables

or figures. And a similar amount includes compound concentrations as part of the assay conditions within figures so that concentrations have to be extracted from graph axes. In some cases there are conflicts between information written in the free text of the Material and Methods section and assay conditions represented

in the legends of tables or figures. Within the set of analyzed articles we found two papers containing such conflicts. To solve these problems curators try to contact the authors where possible. Often the Material and Methods section contains a general description of the assay method and the legends contain more detailed or modified information about the experimental conditions for the measurement of the parameters displayed in the table or figure. One of our main interests in the paper analysis was the question how exact the entities (e.g. proteins, GSK269962 enzymes) can be identified within an article. The outcome was very surprising. We know that some older papers have incomplete data due to the lack of the state of the art at the time. For example, a definite identification of isozymes is often missing in old publications because it was simply not known at that time point that different isozymes exist. In the 1980s three main data resources were available and evolved as standard repositories for nucleotides and proteins: the Protein Data Bank (PDB) (Berman, 2008), SwissProt/UniProtKB (The UniProt Consortium, 2011) and the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collection (INSDC) comprised of the three databases

DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank (Nakamura et al., 2013). Based on the availability of PLEK2 such standard protein and gene databases authors now have the possibility to exactly assign proteins to specific known isozymes by using database accession numbers. Additionally, starting in the 1990s, online repositories for ontologies and controlled vocabularies were developed to establish a universal standard terminology in biology e.g. Gene Ontology (The Gene Ontology Consortium, 2000) or NCBI organism taxonomy. A defined vocabulary is important to avoid misinterpretations and helps to exchange data between resources correctly. Ontologies and hierarchical classifications structure the data of a specific domain, describe the objects and define relationships between these objects. The usage of unique identifiers given by ontologies, controlled vocabularies and databases is essential for a definite data assignment.