The HCV viral load was determined using an in-house real-time PCR assay targeting the 5′-NCR. Results: HCV subtypes 1b, 1a, and 3a were found in 45.5%, 32.0%, and 18.0% of the donors, respectively. The mean viral load of genotype 1 was significantly higher than that of the genotype 3 isolates. Subtype 1a was more frequent among young donors and 3a was more frequent among older donors. Protease inhibitor-resistant variants were detected in 12.8% of the sequenced samples belonging to genotype 1, and a higher frequency was observed among subtype 1a (20%) in comparison to 1b (8%). There was no difference in the prevalence of HCV risk factors among the genotypes or drug-resistant

variants. Conclusions: We found a predominance of subtype 1b, with an increase in the frequency of subtype 1a, in young 4 subjects. Mutations conferring resistance to NS3 inhibitors were frequent in treatment-naive blood donors, particularly those Fludarabine nmr infected with subtype 1a. These variants were detected in the major viral population of HCV quasispecies, have replicative capacities comparable to nonresistant strains, and could be important for predicting

the response to antiviral triple therapy.”
“Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term results of 2 surgical strategies for patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases (bCRLM). Background: Two-stage hepatectomy is the surgical strategy mostly chosen for treating extensive BCLM with the pitfall of dropout after the first stage. One-stage strategy combining limited resections and radiofrequency ablation could be proposed LY411575 cost as an option Selleck S63845 in this population. Patients and Methods: Between 2000 and 2010, 272 patients were consecutively operated in 2 expert centers practicing 1- or 2-stage hepatectomy for bCRLM. A case-match study (1: 1) was conducted using number and size of nodules, synchronous presentation, primary node status, and extrahepatic disease

as matching variables to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The analysis was performed in intention to treat, including patients who did not undergo the second stage. Results: In the case-match analysis (156 matched patients), median OS and DFSdid not differ significantly between patients in 1- and 2-stage hepatectomy, respectively: 37.2 and 34.5 months (P = 0.6), 9.4 and 7.5 months (P = 0.25). Multivariate analysis confirmed the absence of impact of strategy on OS and DFS. Primary advanced T stage and synchronous presentation were predictors of poor OS (HR = 3.67 and 1.92); CEA more than 200 ng/mL, absence of postoperative chemotherapy, and extrahepatic disease were predictive of recurrence (HR = 2.77, 1.85 and 1.69, respectively). Conclusions: This first case-match study demonstrates that on an intention-to-treat analysis 1- and 2-stage hepatectomy in patients with bCRLM achieve comparable OS and DFS, despite the high dropout of the 2-stage strategy.