“
“In Vol 55 No 3 there was an error in the results reported in the paper by Stevens et al (2009). The error occurred in the final page make up. The last two paragraphs of Column 1 p. 188 should be corrected as follows (corrected text in bold type): Linear regression analysis was also performed to determine whether total amount of physical activity was predicted by revision hip arthroplasty. The regression

coefficient for being in the revision group was –394.3 (95% CI –701.1 to –87.5). The regression coefficient for being in the revision group of –121.2 (95% CI –408.0 to –165.7) was no longer significant when age, gender, and Charnley group were added to the prediction equation, suggesting that these additional predictors did confound the relation between group and total amount of physical activity (Box 2). Revision group, CX-5461 supplier age, gender, and Charnley group accounted for 18% of the

variance in total amount of physical selleck inhibitor activity. Finally, linear regression analysis was performed to determine whether total intensity of physical activity was predicted by revision hip arthroplasty. The regression coefficient for being in the revision group was –1153.7 (95% CI –2241.1 to –66.3). The regression coefficient for being in the revision group of –912.8 (95% CI –1989.1 to 163.6) was no longer significant when age, gender, and Charnley group were added to the prediction equation, suggesting that these additional predictors did confound the relation between group and total intensity of physical through activity (Box 3). Revision group, age, gender, and Charnley group accounted for 9% of the variance in total intensity of physical activity. AJP apologises to the authors and to our readers. “
“After stroke, many individuals have

residual walking disability. Despite recent advances in medical and rehabilitation sciences, only half of those who cannot walk on entering rehabilitation after stroke regain the ability to walk (Dean and Mackey 1992). Being able to walk independently is a major determinant of whether an individual returns home following a stroke and has long lasting implications for the person’s quality of life and ability to participate in activities of daily living. For non-ambulatory stroke patients, mechanically assisted walking with body weight support has been suggested as a strategy to facilitate walking (Hesse 1998, Richards et al 1993) because it provides the opportunity to complete more practice of the whole task than would be possible by assisting overground walking. A Cochrane Review (Moseley et al 2005) found no statistically significant difference between treadmill walking with body weight support when compared with any other walking intervention in terms of amount of independent walking, walking speed, or walking capacity.