In total, 115 full text papers were acquired; of these, we needed to contact the authors of 29 papers Dorsomorphin in vitro regarding the exact nature of the adherence data stated. Authors were given 3 months to reply to our emails requesting clarification of unpublished data. If no reply was received within this time, the paper was excluded. Responses were received from 21 (72%) authors. Of the 115 papers read in full, 18 studies met the inclusion

criteria. Seven of these studies ran two or more interventions in parallel, and as such, provided adherence data relating to more than one intervention. Control group data were only included in the analysis if the study was a head-tohead trial (running two interventions in parallel) and if adherence data were Modulators stated for the second group. Therefore, 26 datasets were included. A summary of the included studies is provided in Tables 2 and 3. The quality of the included studies was moderate. Studies generally presented a high quality description of aspects of the study design, and details of the intervention. Items that routinely scored poorly related to the collection of adherence data. The timing, method and period of adherence data recall were rarely described in sufficient detail. A summary of the results of the quality assessment is presented in Table 4. An odds ratio and 95%

CI for the association of each of the factors on adherence was obtained via random effects Selleck SB431542 logistic regression. These are presented in Table 5. There was an association between three factors and decreased levels of adherence: a flexibility component within the intervention (OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.85), 2 or fewer sessions per week (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.94), and duration of the intervention of 20 weeks or more (OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.97). A sensitivity analysis identified associations almost between adherence and each of the following components: balance, group-based set up, 2 or fewer sessions per week, and health service recruitment. This indicates that results were found to be sensitive to

the way in which the key variable, adherence, was defined (Cochrane Collaboration 2002b). The presence or absence of other factors (such as music, group-based set up, and payment for participants) were also analysed but were not significant. The I2 statistic was high (86.2%, 95% CI 81 to 89), indicating a high degree of heterogeneity between study adherence data (Higgins et al 2003). A large Cochran Q figure (180.91) and asymmetry in the funnel plot were observed, which are likely to indicate the presence of clinical or methodological heterogeneity (Cochrane Collaboration 2002a). The pooled proportion of adherence was 0.74 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80). The calculation is further illustrated in the forest plot presented in Figure 2. We attempted to partition out the heterogeneity in observed results by conducting subgroup analyses.