Clinical data from the group of patients are listed in Table 1 T

Clinical data from the group of patients are listed in Table 1. The age varied between 20 and 85 years (median 66 years). Almost all patients presented various comorbidities, mainly manifestations of the metabolic

syndrome like diabetes mellitus (40.2%), hypertension (58.7%), peripheral arterial occlusive disease (20.6%) or coronary heart disease (27.2%). 17.4% suffered from malignancies, and 19.6% showed various degrees of renal disease including end-stage renal failure reflecting the frequently observed comorbidity status of patients with invasive S. aureus infections (Laupland et al., 2003). Serum samples from specific pathogen-free (SPF) mice, juvenile mice and human sera from healthy adults and umbilical cord blood (UCB) were analyzed by Western blots for the presence of anti-Eap antibodies (Fig. 1a). Antibodies could be detected in various concentrations in all human LY2109761 concentration sera. However, SPF mice as well as juvenile mice did not show any anti-Eap antibody response. Further analysis of the human sera revealed IgM, IgG and IgA antibodies in adult samples, while in UCB, only IgG antibodies were found (Fig. 1b). For further analysis, anti-Eap antibodies were quantified by ELISA. In all blood donors, antibodies could be detected with a considerable variability in titers for IgM and IgG (Fig. 2a). No correlation was found between IgG and IgM antibody titers within individuals (correlation coefficient r2: 0.0074; Fig. 2b). this website Also, when comparing

the results for IgA and IgG from Pomalidomide purchase Western blot analysis, no correlation could be found (data not shown). All 92 patients suffering from S. aureus infections showed anti-Eap antibodies. Both IgM as well as IgG anti-Eap antibody titers were significantly higher in patients compared with healthy individuals (IgM, P=0.007; IgG, P<0.0001, Fig. 2a). However, no correlation could be established between IgM and IgG antibody titers. The avidities of anti-Eap antibodies from

healthy controls and patients were high in both groups, with patients displaying significantly higher avidity indices compared with healthy controls (patients mean 0.805, controls mean 0.696; P<0.0001, Fig. 2c). Because transcription of eap by S. aureus in deep wounds was promoted compared with the superficial wounds (Joost et al., 2009), we determined whether the extent of anti-Eap antibody response also differs as a function of infection type (Table 2). Patients with deep infections showed significantly higher anti-Eap antibody titers than those with superficial infections (P=0.001). Detailed analysis revealed significantly higher titers for patients suffering from abscesses compared with other types of infection (P<0.001). Extremely high titers were found in patients presenting with spondylodiscitis (mean 361.2), although in comparison with patients with other types of infections, these did not reach statistical significance (P=0.057), most likely due to the small number of patients (n=4).

Comments are closed.