As shown in Table 2, less than half of the respondents (46.5%) correctly identified the symptoms of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, and only a few (14.3%) had sufficient knowledge of the mode of transmission. Notably, many respondents thought that influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 could

be transmitted by eating uncooked or partially cooked poultry (170/230; 73.9%) and by blood transfusion (145/230; 63%). Approximately half of the respondents (119/230; 51.7%) would adopt sufficient self-protecting behaviours. The most preferred preventive measure was avoiding crowds (67%), and the least favoured was using face masks (20%) (Table 2). A high majority of the respondents received influenza A(H1N1)pdm09-related check details information from mass media (63%), and some received information from healthcare staff (39.1%) (Table 3 and Table 4). In the present study, more than half of the respondents intended to receive the vaccine (134/230; 58.2%); the main reasons for this acceptance were ‘trust in efficacy of vaccine’ (97%), ‘worried about themselves contracting the virus’ (91.7%), and

‘worried about family members contracting the virus’ (82.8%). Among those who had no intention of getting vaccinated, the main reason was ‘do not trust the vaccine potency/potency is unsure’ (76/96; Selleckchem CAL-101 90.5%). In addition, many respondents reported ‘afraid of side effects’ (48/96; 50%) and ‘not worrying about contracting the illness’ (44/96; 45.8%). In the univariate analysis, the intention to get vaccinated was comparable Nabilone between females and males (p = 0.54) and among respondents with

different levels of income (p = 0.55). Additionally, the intention to get vaccinated was not significantly related to either the level of knowledge about the disease (p = 0.1) or perceptions towards preventive measures (p = 0.17). Notably, the intention to get vaccinated was higher among those who regarded influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 as a severe disease (p = 0.018) or a life-threatening disease (p = 0.009), those who worried about themselves (p = 0.028), those who trusted the vaccine efficacy (p < 0.001), and those for whom the vaccination is provided for free (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the intention to get vaccinated was statistically and significantly higher among ‘those who trusted in efficacy of vaccine for prevention of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09’ (p < 0.001), ‘those who were equipped with higher education level’ (p = 0.015) and ‘those who worry about themselves contracting illness’ (p = 0.008). The Cox and Snell R2 = 0.173 and Nagelkerke R2 = 0.233 confirmed the predictive ability of this model. Our data demonstrated that there were misconceptions regarding transmission among the study population, and these misconceptions impacted the adoption of protective measures.