Analytical expressions describing the sensitivity of the

signal enhancement–contrast agent concentration relationship to background tissue parameters have previously been obtained [19] and demonstrate that the relationship is nonlinear and dependent on the tissue parameters, such that the simple linear assumption is generally invalid. Tofts et al. [20] also performed an error analysis indicating how uncertainties in the experimental parameters propagate through to modeled pharmacokinetic parameters, although the results presented were based on breast carcinoma and not directly applicable to the low concentrations associated with mild BBB impairment. In this work, the aim was to determine to what extent scanner noise, drift, intrinsic Selleckchem BLZ945 tissue properties (defined by T10, T20, r1 and r2) and imaging sequence parameters affect the interpretation of post-contrast signal enhancement in different tissues and over the range of values relevant to subtle BBB disorders. DCE-MRI GSK1120212 manufacturer data

was acquired from patients with mild stroke, as part of a larger study investigating associations between stroke subtype and background BBB alterations [15]. This patient population exhibits a range of white matter Parvulin lesion extent and was classified according to the degree of white matter abnormalities present. The DCE-MRI

data were analyzed by conventional assessment of signal enhancement curves and modeling of contrast agent concentration. Phantom and volunteer data were obtained to assess the effects of background scanner noise and drift in different tissues. A theoretical analysis was performed to identify the effect of variations in intrinsic tissue and experimental parameters on the estimation of contrast agent concentration from signal enhancement. Sixty patients with mild ischemic stroke, diagnosed by an experienced stroke physician, underwent MRI. The local ethics committee approved the study and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Diagnostic MRI was performed on all patients, followed by DCE-MRI at least 1 month after the stroke to minimize any acute effect of the stroke on local BBB changes in the stroke lesion. Imaging was undertaken on a 1.5T MRI scanner (GE Signa LX, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with standard quadrature head coil. The diagnostic MRI was used to establish the recent infarct site and to classify white matter lesion extent [axial imaging: diffusion-weighted (TR/TE=9999/98.