43. Of the cases with drusen volume regression, 30.6% (15/49) completely regressed during follow-up, whereas 69.4% (34/49) showed a decreased drusen volume only. In cases of small hard drusen with increased drusen volume, 33.9% (19/56) showed development of new drusen, whereas 66.1% (37/56) of those small hard drusen showed an increased drusen volume. Pointed drusen showed a significant

association with a progression in volume (P = .031; OR 4.89; 95% CI 1.16−20.67), with a chance of 0.80 (95% CI 0.55−0.93) for volume progression. No significant longitudinal changes were observed for dome-shaped and saw-toothed drusen. Drusen with overlying photoreceptor layer or RPE damage showed a statistically significant association with a regression in volume (P = .041; OR 7.67; 95% CI 1.09−54.24 and P = .022; OR 12.38; 95% CI 1.44−106.57), with see more similar chances for drusen volume regression (0.86 [95% CI 0.41−0.98] and 0.89 [95% CI 0.49−0.99], respectively). Drusen reflectivity and homogeneity did not appear to have significant impact on drusen change. In this study,

we were able to show that small hard drusen in patients with the basal laminar drusen phenotype are subject to a constant dynamic process of drusen remodeling. The initial drusen morphology seemed to predict the future course of drusen development. Small hard drusen with a decreased reflectivity of overlying RPE or photoreceptor layer were more likely to show a regression in drusen volume, whereas pointed small hard drusen were more selleck chemical likely to show volume progression. Although the exact mechanism of drusen biogenesis in basal laminar drusen as well as in “typical” AMD is still unclear, an identical mechanism in the developmental courses may be expected because of the similar topographic, structural, and compositional features.5 In both drusen types, RPE cell pathology seems to play a major role in drusen development. Cellular remnants and debris

derived from degenerated RPE cells become sequestered between the RPE basal lamina and the inner collagenous layer of Bruch membrane and provoke a chronic inflammatory response with complement activation.34, 35 and 36 Simultaneous with this continuous process of accumulating extracellular debris, there is a process of drusen removal that may be related to at least 2 Fossariinae factors. The first is the removal of these drusen constituents by macrophages.5, 10 and 37 Different types of macrophages are present in the normal human choroid.38 In contrast to resident choroidal macrophages, Bruch membrane macrophages are only seen in eyes with drusen, making these macrophages a possible player in the process of drusen regression.39 A role for macrophages in the process of drusen removal is further supported by animal models that suggest that an impaired mobilization of macrophages may prevent the clearance of drusen-like lesions in mice.