05) The LR group had the shortest mean length of stay compared w

05). The LR group had the shortest mean length of stay compared with the OR and LS groups (2.0 vs 3.5 and 2.7 days, respectively, P < 0.05). No patient had a complete ureteral orifice, but a cystoscopically appreciable remnant of the resected ureteral orifice was noted in 50% of the LS group vs none with the LR and OR groups (P < 0.05). The estimated 2-year RFS was 65% for the entire cohort with no significant differences among groups.\n\nConclusions: Complete laparoscopic resection of the DUBC is feasible, particularly in low-stage, low-grade upper tract TCC and provides benefits such as shorter operative

times and length of stay compared with an open bladder cuff excision.”
“Objective: To present a method to classify health provider responses to patient cues and concerns according to the VR-CoDES-CC (Del Piccolo et al. (2009) [2] and

LXH254 solubility dmso Zimmermann et al. (submitted for publication) [3]). The system permits sequence analysis and a detailed description of how providers handle patient’s expressions of emotion.\n\nMethods: The Verona-CoDES-P system has been developed based on consensus views within the “Verona Network of Sequence Analysis”. The different phases of the creation process are described in detail. A reliability study has been conducted on 20 interviews from buy Galardin a convenience sample of 104 psychiatric consultations.\n\nResults: The VR-CoDES-P has two main classes of provider responses, corresponding to the degree selleck chemicals of explicitness (yes/no) and space (yes/no) that is given by the health provider to each cue/concern expressed

by the patient. The system can be further subdivided into 17 individual categories. Statistical analyses showed that the VR-CoDES-P is reliable (agreement 92.86%, Cohen’s kappa 0.90 (+/- 0.04) p < 0.0001).\n\nConclusion: Once validity and reliability are tested in different settings, the system should be applied to investigate the relationship between provider responses to patients’ expression of emotions and outcome variables.\n\nPractice implications: Research employing the VR-CoDES-P should be applied to develop research-based approaches to maximize appropriate responses to patients’ indirect and overt expressions of emotional needs. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“To assess the effect of vegetation types and of fire regime on the flammability of dead fuels, samples of litter were collected undisturbed (i.e. keeping the structure of litter layers) in 29 study sites spread over the limestone-derived soils of Provence. The sampling plan comprised the most representative ecosystems of the study area: pure Pinus halepensis stands, mixed pine-oak stands and shrublands. Three classes of litter depth were studied (low, medium and high) to account for the variability existing in the field.

Comments are closed.