However, while not significant and the sample size is too small t

However, while not significant and the sample size is too small to draw conclusions, conifers did cause a greater decrease in click here species richness than broadleaf plantations in grassland to plantations transitions which may be due to these broad differences in forest structure. Due to the small sample size, our results also were variable and inconclusive

regarding the general belief that mixed species Eltanexor ic50 plantations support more native species abundance and diversity than monocultures (Hartley 2002; Stephens and Wagner 2007). Plantation age Older plantations established on previously forested lands, are generally expected to support higher levels of diversity given additional time to develop structural complexity (Lugo 1992; Munro https://www.selleckchem.com/products/azd1080.html et al. 2009), and favorable microclimates and litter and humus layers that are more conducive to native plant colonization (Geldenhuys 1997; Brockerhoff et al. 2003, 2008; Nagaike et al. 2006). Other studies, however, have found high levels of species richness in younger plantations, but have primarily attributed this to an increase in

light-demanding ruderal and often exotic species, with native forest species increasing with plantation age (Ito et al. 2004; Nagaike et al. 2006; Soo et al. 2009). On the other hand, plantations established on natural or semi-natural shrublands and grasslands would be expected to have a greater negative effect on native species with age, increasing canopy cover, and with multiple rotations (Wallace and Good 1995; Maccherini and

De Dominicis 2003; O’Connor 2005). Our results provide some support for this idea, with a significant negative relationship with plantation age and species richness in the shrubland to plantation category and an insignificant but similar trend with grassland afforestation. Clearly, this would also depend on the particular growth rate of the plantation species used, the ecological characteristics of native understory species, Baf-A1 price and other environmental and site conditions including adequate seed sources and climate conditions (Hartley 2002; Cusack and Montagnini 2004). Management effects Discussions of management strategies to conserve biodiversity in plantations are generally focused on enhancing habitat for forest species. In a synthesis of management recommendations to improve biodiversity outcomes of plantations established on previously forested lands, Hartley (2002) suggests (1) leaving remnant native trees, snags, and cavity trees during harvest, (2) managing plantations on longer rotations, (3) utilizing native species over exotics and polycultures over monocultures, (4) avoiding intensive site preparation, and (5) thinning some plantations heavily and others not to maintain a mosaic of open to non-open areas to encourage native species colonization. Of these recommendations we found clear support for using native species over exotic species.

Comments are closed.