We conclude that the ASLR consists of ipsilateral hip flexion, a contralateral hip extension Idelalisib moment, force closure by the lateral abdominal muscles, sagittal plane pelvis stabilization by the abdominal wall, and activity of contralateral transverse plane rotators of the pelvis. The lateral abdominal

muscles were more asymmetrically active with weight and with a belt (Table 2, Fig. 3), apparently because weight increases the ipsilateral task component, and the belt decreases the symmetrical task component. For TA and OI this was more so than for OE (Table 2, Fig. 3), possibly because OE was not used to counter transverse plane rotation of the pelvis. Between TA and OI, no difference was found in degree of asymmetry (Table 2). Authors tend to report “symmetry” when statistical analysis does not reveal a significant effect of side (e.g., Danneels et al., 2001; Beales et al., 2010b). Sirolimus price Strictly speaking, this is inaccurate, because one cannot prove exact symmetry on statistical grounds. More importantly, this tendency distracts

from the fact that muscles engage in multitasking (Saunders et al., 2004; Hu et al., 2011), with some task components being symmetrical, and others asymmetrical (Hodges, 2008). Symmetry” is a mathematical concept (De Sautoy, 2008). It maybe a property of tasks, as understood biomechanically, not an empirical property of muscle activity or shape. Theoretically, force closure implies symmetric TA, OI, and OE activity. On the other hand, the lack of a statistical effect of side on OE (Table 1) does not prove that OE was engaged in force closure only, as it may also have played a role in sagittal plane control of the pelvis. All four abdominal muscles have different symmetric and asymmetric task components (Table 3). TA and OI, for instance, were expected to have a clear symmetric task component, but were found to have significant asymmetry. Hip flexors exert a forward pull on the ipsilateral ilium, which in the ASLR is prevented, at least in part,

by contralateral BF, and force closure is needed to transfer the contralateral extension moment toward ipsilateral. Thus, failing force closure is a likely cause of problems during the ASLR. The sacroiliac joint is more stable with the ilium Anacetrapib in posterior rotation (Mens et al., 1999; Vleeming et al., 2008), but in subjects with PGP, actual forward rotation has been observed (Hungerford et al., 2004). Forward rotation of the ipsilateral ilium, and backward rotation contralaterally, can both be established by palpation, which may confirm that failing force closure is the problem. Moreover, forward rotation of the ilium stretches the ipsilateral long dorsal sacroiliac ligament, which then is painful upon palpation (Vleeming et al., 1996). Perhaps the ASLR identifies that subgroup of subjects with PGP who have problems with force closure (cf. Mens et al., 2001, 2006).