18 After debating intensely, the committee thinks that there is a need to seriously relook at the proper administration schedule of rotavirus vaccines in India in order to achieve higher yields in term of protective efficacy. The committee reviewed the emerging data on intussusception related to current rotavirus vaccines following large-scale use of these vaccines in Mexico, Brazil, Australia and US.19, 20, 21 and 22 The post-marketing surveillance (PMS) data from India
by the manufacturers of two rotavirus vaccines licensed in India was also PD-1 antibody inhibitor reviewed. Based on PMS data, the current rotavirus vaccines have been associated with an increased risk of intussusceptions (about 1–2/100,000 infants vaccinated) for a short period after administration of the first dose in some populations.19 This risk is 5–10 times lower than that observed with the previously licensed vaccine (1 case per 10,000 doses). There are no published
reports on incidence/rates of acute intussusception following rotavirus vaccination in India. However, the PMS data (unpublished) of Indian manufacturers revealed 13 cases of acute intussusceptions associated (causality not yet NVP-LDE225 datasheet proved) with rotavirus vaccines administration since the launch of RV1 in India till December 2011, and two cases following RV5 during a five-month surveillance period (May–September 2011) Metalloexopeptidase in India. There is limited information on the incidence of intussusception and its risk factors in India. No large-scale trials of rotavirus vaccines have been conducted in the country to assess whether there is an increased risk of intussusception associated with the vaccination. Data on
background rates of intussusception in developing countries are required to facilitate informed decision making about use of new rotavirus vaccines. These background rates are also needed for estimation of the sample size needed for studies to demonstrate safety both before and after licensure of new rotavirus vaccines. Such population-based data are not available in most developing countries, including India. However, a recent study from Delhi found the incidence of intussusception requiring hospitalization was 17.7 cases per 100,000 infant-years of follow-up (95% CI: 5.9–41.4 cases per 100,000 infant-years).23 The study also concluded that natural rotavirus infection did not appear to be a major cause of intussusception in Indian infants. This incidence appears to be lower than that reported in other middle- and high-income countries. Another retrospective study from a tertiary-care hospital from south India identified 31 children with definite intussusception during the study period of 1 January 2001–30 June 2004.