Explanations for the failure to learn phonologically similar words typically focus on top-down mechanisms, such as task demands
(Werker et al., 1998; Yoshida, Fennell, Swingley, & Werker, 2009) or lexical access (Swingley & Aslin, 2007). Proponents of the former argue that the demands of laboratory word learning tasks are heavy because the children are required to encode both visual and auditory forms in a short time period and then to connect them to one another. This requires children to allocate their limited resources to specific elements this website of the task (for a review, see Werker & Fennell, 2006). PRIMIR (Werker & Curtin, 2005) describes this as a case where general perceptual processes overwhelm the child’s system, leaving little room for phonetic ones. Additionally, the switch task typically used in these experiments (see Werker et al., 1998) requires that information be represented and organized robustly, as success requires the infant to determine that something is not part of a category. Children this age succeed more easily at positive identification tasks CH5424802 price in which they must map an auditory word form to an object (Ballem & Plunkett, 2005). Even infants trained
in the style of Stager and Werker (1997) correctly identify word–object pairings when the test is presented using a two-alternative looking paradigm (Yoshida et al., 2009). Lack of capacity coupled to the difficulty of the switch task might negatively affect 14-month-olds’ use of their discrimination skills in this task. However, as children get older, they become more adept, and by 20 months, they learn phonologically similar words in the switch task (Werker, Fennell, Corcoran, & Stager, 2002). Alternatively, it has been suggested that Thalidomide processes involved in lexical access, particularly competition (e.g., Dahan, Magnuson, Tanenhaus, & Hogan, 2001; Luce & Pisoni, 1998), interfere with learning (Swingley & Aslin, 2007). In the small lexicon
of 14-month-olds, known words are accessed somewhat easily from phonetic input and compete with novel or newly learned words. New words that sound similar to existing words will activate both a novel representation and these existing known words, and do not fare well in the resulting competition. Thus, 14-month-olds learning words like “tog” will have difficulty because they retrieve “dog” instead (Swingley & Aslin, 2007). Similarly, when infants learn two similar words at once, the word forms compete with one another for representation. As a result, each inhibits the other and learning fails, or alternatively, both representations get linked to the referent (as they are both momentarily active in parallel).